What does wallet logo and token list inclusion cover?
Wallet inclusion work prepares the information a wallet or token-list review may ask the project to provide. The scope is focused on asset presentation and verification, not on exchange trading or a promise of placement.
| Workstream | What we prepare or coordinate |
|---|---|
| Trust Wallet assets | Token identity details, logo files and supporting project links for an asset request |
| Jupiter verification | Project information and verification materials for the relevant Jupiter request |
| Wallet token lists | Consistent token metadata and source links for the list or wallet named in scope |
| Wallet tracking | A record of where the asset appears, what has been submitted and what remains pending |
Wallet presentation can shape whether users recognize the correct asset when searching or reviewing token information. We start by confirming the exact network and contract address, then compare the project’s current public details with the materials supplied for review. That catches avoidable inconsistencies before submission.
This is a fit for teams with a live token and a specific wallet, asset-list or verification objective. If the immediate priority is a tracker profile rather than a wallet, consider explorer token information and logo updates or listings on other crypto trackers.
Which details should be ready before a wallet submission?
A submission is easier to review when the token identity, brand assets and public project information agree. Prepare the source materials first; do not rely on a logo file alone to explain which asset should be represented.
| Item | Check before sending |
|---|---|
| Token identity | Network, contract address, token name and ticker match the project’s official references |
| Logo files | The file is the approved current mark and is legible at small display sizes |
| Project references | Website and official social links lead to active, consistent project information |
| Change history | Any migration, ticker change or rebrand is explained with the relevant current details |
| Request owner | One team member can answer review questions and confirm corrections |
Our kickoff checklist records each item as ready, missing or requiring clarification. We compare the submitted token details with the project’s own sources and flag mismatches before the package goes out. If the token has changed contracts or branding, resolve that context before requesting a new representation; otherwise, reviewers and users may encounter conflicting identity information.
Send the contract address and network through a secure channel, along with the current logo and official project links. We can also coordinate related contract migration and rebranding updates when the wallet materials need to reflect a change.
How do Trust Wallet and Jupiter verification differ?
Treat each wallet request as a separate destination with its own submitted materials and status. A completed package for one destination is not evidence that another wallet or token list has accepted the same asset.
| Destination | Practical focus |
|---|---|
| Trust Wallet | Prepare the token asset information and logo for the Trust Wallet request in scope |
| Jupiter | Coordinate the relevant verification request using accurate project and token references |
| Other wallet lists | Confirm the specific destination and its requested format before adapting materials |
For Trust Wallet, we organize the project’s token details and asset files as a coherent request. For Jupiter, we identify the relevant verification route and prepare consistent supporting information. In both cases, the project team should be able to confirm that the contract address, network and official links are correct before submission.
Wallet tracking is a separate user-facing question: whether a particular wallet currently displays the asset and what information is shown. We document observable status rather than treating a sent request as a completed inclusion. If the project also needs broader listing work, see CoinMarketCap community verification or the listings and verification overview to choose the next workstream.
How do we manage the wallet review and status checks?
We manage wallet inclusion as a traceable submission, from checking source details to recording the outcome. You have one account lead at AEOTech for questions, approvals and follow-up.
- Scope the destination. Confirm the wallet or token list, network, contract address and requested outcome.
- Check the materials. Review the logo, token identity, official links and any change history against the project’s sources.
- Approve the package. You confirm the final details before we submit or coordinate the request.
- Track the response. We log submission status, visible updates and any questions or corrections to address.
- Close or continue. We share the evidence available and identify the next action if the request remains open.
The kickoff checklist and submission log make the work easy to audit internally. A useful log records the destination, package version, date sent, response received and links or screenshots showing the visible result. That gives your team a practical handoff rather than a vague status update.
Timing follows the review and response path for the destination, as well as how quickly the project can confirm corrections. We keep the process moving by asking for missing information in one consolidated list and routing any requested edits to the project owner. For adjacent work, explorer token information and logo updates can help align public token details across surfaces.
What can wallet token inclusion not control?
Our work controls the quality and traceability of the materials we prepare, not a wallet’s final review decision or display behavior.
| Within the project’s control | Outside the project’s control |
|---|---|
| Accurate token information and approved brand files | Whether a wallet accepts or declines a request |
| Prompt answers to clarification requests | Review timing and any changes to the wallet’s process |
| Consistent official links and change documentation | When an accepted asset becomes visible across wallet views |
Before engagement, confirm that the project controls the token identity, logo and official channels being submitted. Provide a clear explanation for migrations or rebrands, and name someone who can approve corrections. These checks reduce preventable inconsistencies and let us report the actual status instead of implying that a request has been approved.
A wallet may review, request changes to or decline a submission, and its display or review process can change; we cannot promise acceptance, a specific review time or identical visibility across wallet views. We do commit to the agreed preparation, submission coordination and documented follow-up. Send us the target wallet, network, contract address, current logo and official project links, and AEOTech will return a scoped checklist and next steps.
Prices
| Service | Price | Quote |
|---|---|---|
| Wallet Listings | from $990 / project |
Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.
How it works
- Confirm the targetName the wallet or token list and share the network and contract address. We confirm the scope before collecting materials.
- Send project sourcesProvide the approved logo, official links and any migration or rebrand context. We flag missing or inconsistent details.
- Review and approveWe prepare the request package and send it to your project owner for factual approval before submission.
- Coordinate and trackWe coordinate the agreed request, record responses and share evidence of visible status or any outstanding review items.
Frequently asked questions
What do you need from us to prepare a wallet token submission?
Send the wallet or token-list destination, network, contract address, token name and ticker, approved logo files, official project links and a contact who can approve details. Include migration or rebrand context if the token identity has changed. We use a kickoff checklist to mark what is ready and what needs clarification before submission.
Does Trust Wallet inclusion also mean the token is verified on Jupiter?
No. Trust Wallet and Jupiter are separate destinations, so each request needs its own scope and status check. We can coordinate both when they are included in the agreed project scope, but one submission does not confirm acceptance or visibility on the other.
How long does wallet logo and token list inclusion take?
The timeline follows the destination’s review and response path and how quickly your team can approve corrections. We organize the materials and track follow-up, then report the status we can verify. We do not set a review date on behalf of a wallet.
Can you guarantee that Trust Wallet or Jupiter will accept the request?
No. The wallet controls its review decision, process and display behavior. We can commit to the agreed preparation, coordination and status reporting, but acceptance and the timing of any visible update are not ours to decide.
Can you update a logo after a token migration or rebrand?
Yes, we can include the change context in scope. Share the current contract address, previous identity where relevant, approved new logo and official announcement or project references. We will check that the request materials describe the current asset clearly and can coordinate related migration and rebranding updates.
What does the wallet inclusion service cost?
The service starts from $990 / project. The confirmed scope depends on the destinations and preparation or follow-up work requested. Share the wallet names and token details, and we will specify the deliverables before work begins.
Tell us about your project
Answer four quick questions and a manager will send you a plan, timing and a price range within the hour. Everything stays confidential.
Loading the form…